If anything, the pandemic accelerated the changes to the workplace that were already in motion. There was already a push for more flexibility in where and how people worked, spending a day or two working from home was becoming more commonplace, and establishing a clearer boundary between the workday and downtime was already picking up steam. On the latest episode of Growth@Scale, organizational strategist Katie Jackson spoke with Matt Widdoes about the changes we’ve seen in the workplace in the last few years. 

Katie argues that as the dynamics of the workplace continue to evolve, it is in a company’s best interest to listen to their employees and take their experiences and concerns into account when making important decisions that could have positive or negative impact on headcount and workplace culture. 

Employees Setting More Boundaries 

The pandemic, as devastating as it was, acted as a mirror for many. Reflecting upon their lifestyles and professional commitments, employees emerged with heightened self-awareness. This has led to an increasing number of workers vocalizing their need for flexible schedules and the ability to work remotely. They’re setting clear boundaries that prioritize well-being and work-life balance.

Sometimes, it’s impossible to put the genie back in the bottle. As the workforce has grown accustomed to a new work-life balance, companies need to be empathetic to how their employees choose to spend their time, both on and off the job. 

As we tiptoe back to physical workspaces, it’s imperative to redefine boundaries. This involves balancing intense work hours with much-needed social interactions, ensuring the office remains a space of productivity and camaraderie.

Navigating the Hybrid Work Labyrinth 

Merging the best of in-office and remote work is not without challenges. While flexibility is essential, it’s equally important to ensure hybrid work models are equitable. This requires innovative strategies, ensuring all employees, regardless of their work location, feel included and valued.

Not every job can be done from home, and not every job needs to be bookended by a tedious commute to and from the office. However a company decides to settle into a new normal, balancing the concerns of employees and what arrangement is most productive is critical for preserving a company’s culture and limiting any potential for resentment. By approaching challenges with empathy and involving workers in ideating solutions, companies can cultivate a collaborative and inclusive environment.

Unlimited PTO – A Double-Edged Sword

While unlimited paid time off might sound like a dream, it demands organizational maturity. The emphasis should lean more towards preventing burnout and ensuring mental well-being rather than the logistics of PTO.

This might be a matter of sending periodic reminders to employees to book time off, setting limits on how many employees can be “out-of-office” at a given time, or collectively deciding to close down for a company-wide break, usually around a holiday. However the arrangement manifests, companies are better served when their employees know that not only can they take time off, the should.

The Four-Day Work Week 

This idea is more than just a trend. It’s a testament to expanding horizons and being open to significant departures from the status quo. Every couple weeks, we see a new study that shows a four-day work week may even increase productivity.  By experimenting with a reduced work week, companies can challenge traditional norms and discover that it’s possible for employee satisfaction, work-life balance, and increased productivity to peacefully coexist.  

While we’ve all become accustomed to playfully letting a co-worker know they’re on mute, as we shift into this new future of work, it’s important for employees’ concerns not to fall on deaf ears. We’ve all had a taste of the freedom and flexibility that is possible without sacrificing productivity, so it’s critical to respect those established truths while driving organizational goals forward.

Book a complimentary consultation with one of our experts
to learn how MAVAN can help your business grow.


Want more growth insights?

Thank you! form is submitted

[hubspot type=”form” portal=”20951211″ id=”9c538ed2-fb12-45f1-a573-ad7953c058cc”]


Related Content

  • MAVAN featured graphic on a deep navy-to-black background with faint coral light streaks. Bold white headline reads "WILL YOUR GROWTH PARTNER SCALE ACROSS THE PORTFOLIO?" with "SCALE" in coral red. Beneath a divider labeled "PORTFOLIO COMPANIES," a row of five building tiles shows the first outlined in coral red with a checkmark and the label "WORKS FOR ONE.", while the next four are dim grey with a "?" above each, illustrating a growth partner that succeeds at one company but is unproven across the rest. A white bar below reads "EVALUATE ON TWO THINGS:" followed by "1 · MULTI-COMPANY BANDWIDTH" and "2 · PROVEN PLAYBOOK." Coral MAVAN logo in the lower right.

    How Do You Evaluate a Portfolio Growth Partner?

    To evaluate a growth partner for a fund’s portfolio, test two things. First, multi-company bandwidth: whether their operating model, not their headcount, lets them run many portfolio companies at once without quality slipping. Second, a proven playbook: a documented growth system that transfers between companies and survives leadership change, rather than living in one operator’s head.

    Read More
  • MAVAN featured graphic on a deep navy-to-black background titled "EMBEDDED OPERATOR vs. AGENCY RETAINER," with "OPERATOR" in coral red. On the left, four white circular nodes labeled "Acquisition," "Data," "Creative," and "Lifecycle" connect by white lines into a central coral-red hexagon reading "OWNS THE NUMBER." On the right, a dashed box labeled "RENTS ACTIVITY" holds the same four functions — "Acquisition," "Data," "Creative," and "Lifecycle" — as separate, disconnected white cards. A caption reads "One owns your outcome. One bills a scope." The MAVAN logo appears in the lower right.

    Which Is Best For Growth: Embedded Operators or Agency Retainers?

    An embedded growth operator is an outside team that plugs into your company — your Slack, your data, your standups — and owns a business outcome as one accountable unit. A traditional agency retainer rents you activity at arm’s length across separate scopes. The embedded model exists to end the fragmentation that stalls venture-backed growth.

    Read More
  • MAVAN featured graphic titled “What Funds Want From a Portfolio Growth Partner,” with “REPEATABILITY” emphasized in coral red. A glowing central growth-engine icon connects to five identical portfolio-company dashboard tiles, illustrating one shared growth operating system powering multiple portcos instead of isolated one-off engagements. Subtle converging data lines on both sides direct attention toward the shared engine, reinforcing repeatable, scalable portfolio growth.

    What Do Funds Want From a Portfolio Growth Partner? Repeatability!

    What funds actually want from a portfolio growth partner is repeatability — a portable growth operating system that produces comparable results across very different portfolio companies. Repeatability shows up as a single source of truth, a board-grade scoreboard, a 90-day sprint, and a clean handoff, so each win compounds across the portfolio instead of staying at one company.

    Read More