If anything, the pandemic accelerated the changes to the workplace that were already in motion. There was already a push for more flexibility in where and how people worked, spending a day or two working from home was becoming more commonplace, and establishing a clearer boundary between the workday and downtime was already picking up steam. On the latest episode of Growth@Scale, organizational strategist Katie Jackson spoke with Matt Widdoes about the changes we’ve seen in the workplace in the last few years. 

Katie argues that as the dynamics of the workplace continue to evolve, it is in a company’s best interest to listen to their employees and take their experiences and concerns into account when making important decisions that could have positive or negative impact on headcount and workplace culture. 

Employees Setting More Boundaries 

The pandemic, as devastating as it was, acted as a mirror for many. Reflecting upon their lifestyles and professional commitments, employees emerged with heightened self-awareness. This has led to an increasing number of workers vocalizing their need for flexible schedules and the ability to work remotely. They’re setting clear boundaries that prioritize well-being and work-life balance.

Sometimes, it’s impossible to put the genie back in the bottle. As the workforce has grown accustomed to a new work-life balance, companies need to be empathetic to how their employees choose to spend their time, both on and off the job. 

As we tiptoe back to physical workspaces, it’s imperative to redefine boundaries. This involves balancing intense work hours with much-needed social interactions, ensuring the office remains a space of productivity and camaraderie.

Navigating the Hybrid Work Labyrinth 

Merging the best of in-office and remote work is not without challenges. While flexibility is essential, it’s equally important to ensure hybrid work models are equitable. This requires innovative strategies, ensuring all employees, regardless of their work location, feel included and valued.

Not every job can be done from home, and not every job needs to be bookended by a tedious commute to and from the office. However a company decides to settle into a new normal, balancing the concerns of employees and what arrangement is most productive is critical for preserving a company’s culture and limiting any potential for resentment. By approaching challenges with empathy and involving workers in ideating solutions, companies can cultivate a collaborative and inclusive environment.

Unlimited PTO – A Double-Edged Sword

While unlimited paid time off might sound like a dream, it demands organizational maturity. The emphasis should lean more towards preventing burnout and ensuring mental well-being rather than the logistics of PTO.

This might be a matter of sending periodic reminders to employees to book time off, setting limits on how many employees can be “out-of-office” at a given time, or collectively deciding to close down for a company-wide break, usually around a holiday. However the arrangement manifests, companies are better served when their employees know that not only can they take time off, the should.

The Four-Day Work Week 

This idea is more than just a trend. It’s a testament to expanding horizons and being open to significant departures from the status quo. Every couple weeks, we see a new study that shows a four-day work week may even increase productivity.  By experimenting with a reduced work week, companies can challenge traditional norms and discover that it’s possible for employee satisfaction, work-life balance, and increased productivity to peacefully coexist.  

While we’ve all become accustomed to playfully letting a co-worker know they’re on mute, as we shift into this new future of work, it’s important for employees’ concerns not to fall on deaf ears. We’ve all had a taste of the freedom and flexibility that is possible without sacrificing productivity, so it’s critical to respect those established truths while driving organizational goals forward.

Book a complimentary consultation with one of our experts
to learn how MAVAN can help your business grow.


Want more growth insights?

Thank you! form is submitted

[hubspot type=”form” portal=”20951211″ id=”9c538ed2-fb12-45f1-a573-ad7953c058cc”]


Related Content

  • MAVAN featured infographic titled “Which CAC Should You Use?” comparing three customer acquisition cost metrics on a deep navy-to-black background. Three ascending white bars represent PAID CAC, BLENDED CAC, and FULLY-LOADED CAC, with the fully-loaded bar tallest and highlighted by a glowing coral-red cap and “STEER BY THIS” flag. Subtle geometric chevrons on both sides direct attention toward the chart. Bottom caption reads, “Track all three. Drive by one.” Coral MAVAN logo appears beneath the chart.

    Which CAC Should You Use — Fully-Loaded, Blended, or Paid?

    There are three ways to measure customer acquisition cost — paid, blended, and fully-loaded. Most teams pick one per decision. MAVAN’s operators steer by fully-loaded CAC, paired with gross-margin lifetime value, because it counts every cost. Paid and blended stay useful for channel calls and external reporting, but never as the number that drives the business.

    Read More
  • MAVAN featured graphic titled “Which Attribution Model Should B2B SaaS Use?” on a deep navy-to-black background, with “Which” underlined in coral red. A horizontal B2B buyer journey connects four touchpoints—LinkedIn Ad, Report, Webinar, and Branded Search. Attribution brackets show First-Touch crediting the LinkedIn Ad, Last-Touch crediting Branded Search, and Position-Based attribution spanning LinkedIn Ad through Webinar. The caption reads, “Same deal. Three models. Three different winners.” Subtle coral data lines and arcs on both sides guide attention toward the comparison, with the MAVAN logo below.

    Which Attribution Model Should B2B SaaS Use?

    There is no single best attribution model for B2B SaaS. The right one is the simplest model that can still answer the budget decision you face. For most teams past a few channels and a multi-month sales cycle, that means a position-based multi-touch model tracked at the account level.

    Read More
  • MAVAN infographic titled “Relying on SKAN Attribution Alone Can Hide Your Highest-Value Users.” A short white revenue bar remains below a horizontal “$20 tracked cap,” while three much taller gray outlined bars extend above it. A coral “Hidden” bracket marks the untracked value, illustrating how SKAN attribution can obscure high-value users and revenue.

    How Do You Solve SKAN Attribution For Multi-Channel Apps?

    To solve SKAN attribution for multi-channel apps, fix your conversion-value and revenue configuration first, then triangulate SKAN with incrementality testing and one internal source of truth — so every channel gets measured against the same number.

    Read More